Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ?

[Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>]

* iljitsch () muada com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) [Mon 05 May 2008, 10:09 CEST]:
> PS. Am I the only one who is annoyed by the reduction in usable 
> subject space by the superfluous [NANOG]?

No, and I'm just as annoyed by the (non-McQ) footer with superfluous 
information attached to each mail.


On 5 mei 2008, at 17:14, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
> Those of us who are *really* annoyed by stuff like that usually cook 
> up a procmail recipe to strip it out.. :)

That will only lead to duplicates of "Re: " (before and after the tag) 
in the Subject, I'm afraid.


        -- Niels.

-- 

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG () nanog org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog