nanog mailing list archives
Re: amazonaws.com?
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 07:45:50 -0400
I'm not on the MLC (which doesn't have any community representatives on it at present) anymore. Nonetheless, I implore everyone to consider this thread dead. It's run far enough afield on speculation and analogies that I for one think it's fairly out of scope. Thanks, ---Rob
Current thread:
- Re: amazonaws.com?, (continued)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Peter Beckman (May 28)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Dorn Hetzel (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Joel Jaeggli (May 29)
- RE: amazonaws.com? Matthew Huff (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Dorn Hetzel (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Joel Jaeggli (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Barry Shein (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Joel Jaeggli (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Barry Shein (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Joel Jaeggli (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Robert E. Seastrom (May 30)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Dorn Hetzel (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Barry Shein (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Peter Beckman (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Barry Shein (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Luke S Crawford (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Peter Beckman (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Luke S Crawford (May 29)
- NANOG NYC Event Rod Beck (May 31)
- Re: NANOG NYC Event Christopher Morrow (May 31)
- RE: [SPAM-HEADER] - Re: NANOG NYC Event - Email found in subject Rod Beck (May 31)