Re: Hughes Network

[Michael Holstein <michael.holstein () csuohio edu>]

> Has anyone else noticed that the [NANOG] prefix has been missing
> intermittently from the list traffic over the last couple of days?
>   

Different SMTP servers, it appears (looks like they might have been 
using an Ironport box to do anti-spam, and it was probably doing the 
subject re-writes as well)

With the [NANOG] in subject :

received: from linuxbox.org ([24.155.83.21])
        by thor.merit.edu with ESMTP; 20 May 2008 10:27:41 -0400

Without the subject tag :

Received: from nameserver2.ttec.com ([64.95.32.37] helo=smtp.ttec.com)
        by s0.nanog.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD))
        (envelope-from <jmaimon () ttec com>) id 1JzEFp-0006tP-1S
        for nanog () nanog org; Thu, 22 May 2008 17:07:01 +0000


Cheers,

Michael Holstein
Cleveland State University