nanog mailing list archives

Re: [NANOG] Charter Communications going to sniff traffic foradvertising?


From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 13:30:52 -0400

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Steven M. Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu> wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008 09:46:05 -0400

The other day, the Wall Street Journal ran a brief piece on VPN
providers...  The threat they had in mind was wireless hotspots, but
any sort of on-link evil can be dealt with that way.

sure would be nice if some vendor would partner with a CDN-type group
(or a vendor that had enough 'local presence') to offer this sort of
thing... It doesnt' neessarily have to be IPSEC or SSL I bet... though
longer term SSL or IPSEC seem like better options (since phorm/blah
will quickly start poking into PPTP/gre tunnels as well).

Oh, how do you know you can trust the VPN folks anymore than the
cable-modem folks though? eventually the same cost issues are going to
arise for the VPN folks as did for cable-modem/dsl folks (downward
pressure on pricing and infra/opex/capex costs going
up/not-decreasing).

-Chris

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG () nanog org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog


Current thread: