nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10GE router resource
From: Justin Shore <justin () justinshore com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:18:04 -0500
michael.dillon () bt com wrote:
Even if it is technically feasible to route traffic over a server,A computer running Linux is not a server. If it's job is to route and forward packets, then it is a router. And the factthat people are pushing the envelope at 10G is because Linux routers are already known to do a great job at 1G and below.
Just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should. http://katcampbell.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/overload.jpg http://www.gpsa.co.za/Jokes/OVERLOAD.JPG http://englishrussia.com/images/overload.jpg http://www.tensionnot.com/images/images/Automobiles587.jpg Justin
Current thread:
- RE: 10GE router resource, (continued)
- RE: 10GE router resource Fred Reimer (Mar 26)
- RE: 10GE router resource Lincoln Dale (Mar 26)
- RE: 10GE router resource Fred Reimer (Mar 27)
- Re: 10GE router resource Adrian Chadd (Mar 25)
- RE: 10GE router resource Fred Reimer (Mar 26)
- Re: 10GE router resource Chris Marlatt (Mar 27)
- RE: 10GE router resource michael.dillon (Mar 26)
- Re: 10GE router resource Greg VILLAIN (Mar 26)
- Re: 10GE router resource Mark Newton (Mar 26)
- RE: 10GE router resource michael.dillon (Mar 26)
- Re: 10GE router resource Justin Shore (Mar 26)
- Re: 10GE router resource Adrian Chadd (Mar 26)
- Re: 10GE router resource Tore Anderson (Mar 27)
- Re: 10GE router resource Robert Boyle (Mar 27)
- Re: 10GE router resource Justin Shore (Mar 27)
- Re: 10GE router resource ann kok (Mar 27)
- Re: 10GE router resource Chris Marlatt (Mar 27)
- Re: 10GE router resource Adrian Chadd (Mar 26)
- RE: 10GE router resource Ray Burkholder (Mar 26)
- RE: 10GE router resource michael.dillon (Mar 26)
- Message not available
- RE: 10GE router resource Robert Boyle (Mar 26)