nanog mailing list archives
RE: I'm going to stay on the NANOG list anyway
From: Al Iverson <aiversonlists () spamresource com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:12:01 -0500
Thanks for letting us know that we should update our kill files. Al -----Original Message----- From: James R. Cutler <james.cutler () consultant com> Sent: March 21, 2008 4:39 PM To: ?NANOG? Operators Group 3F_Operators_Group_ <nanog () merit edu> Subject: I'm going to stay on the NANOG list anyway Whoops! I'm still coming to grips with multihoming. According to your thinking, my many years on the NANOG mailing list were wrong and you tell me I should leave. I don't think I can allow you to do that, Andrew. Paul Vixie, Dillon, Bush, and others have given many examples of appropriate and concise direction giving to newby questioners. Follow their lead, please. Cutler On Mar 21, 2008, at 5:15 PM, <andrew2 () one net> wrote:
Scott McGrath wrote:If we do not help the newbies how will they ever become clued. I can certainly remember when I did not know a bit from a byte.I agree, but I question if NANOG is the appropriate medium for such help. I tend to (maybe mistakenly) assume a working knowledge of basic multihoming concepts is essentially a prerequisite for active participation on the NANOG mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: I'm going to stay on the NANOG list anyway Al Iverson (Mar 21)