nanog mailing list archives
Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack)
From: "Larry J. Blunk" <ljb () merit edu>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:18:06 -0400
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Jeff Aitken <jaitken () aitken com> wrote:IMHO a better use of our time would be to solve the underlying technical issue(s). Whether it's soBGP, sBGP, or something else, we need to figure out how to make one of these proposals work and get it implemented.Start with "implement RFC 2827 yourself, and start pushing other SPs to implement it" maybe? srs
RFC2827 is about source address filtering which is not really the same as BGP route announcement filtering. Unfortunately, I have not come across any RFC's with a thorough discussion of route filtering. It is mentioned briefly in RFC 3013, but section 4.5 only suggests filtering routes for private address space. RFC 4778 also mentions it, but again, there is no in depth discussion. Perhaps it is time for an RFC dedicated to route filtering practices? -Larry Blunk Merit
Current thread:
- Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Glen Kent (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Jeff Aitken (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Larry J. Blunk (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Pekka Savola (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Joe Maimon (Mar 17)