nanog mailing list archives
Re: load balancing and fault tolerance without load balancer
From: "John Moser" <jmoser () diamondgate net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:45:38 -0500 (CDT)
On 14-Mar-2008, at 12:42, Joe Shen wrote:Is there any way to solve problem above?The approach described in <http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0505/abley.cluster.html > would probably work, so long as the routers choosing between the ECMP routes are able to make route selections per flow, and not just per packet (e.g. "ip cef" on a cisco). Tony Kapela did a lightning talk a few meetings ago about another cisco-specific approach which used some kind of SLA-measuring cisco feature to do the same thing without needing to run a routing protocol on a server. I can't seem to find a link to the details, but if someone else knows where it is it'd be good to know.
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0710/presentations/Kapela-lightning.pdf -John
Current thread:
- load balancing and fault tolerance without load balancer Joe Shen (Mar 14)
- Re: load balancing and fault tolerance without load balancer Bill Nash (Mar 14)
- Re: load balancing and fault tolerance without load balancer Larry J. Blunk (Mar 14)
- Re: load balancing and fault tolerance without load balancer Joe Abley (Mar 14)
- Re: load balancing and fault tolerance without load balancer John Moser (Mar 14)
- Re: load balancing and fault tolerance without load balancer Mark Smith (Mar 14)
- RE: load balancing and fault tolerance without load balancer Darden, Patrick S. (Mar 17)