nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:44:34 +0900
sorry to pick this up so late. source routing is still requested and sometimes mandated at inter-as borders. for the reasons deepak stated. note that this does not expose any vulnerability. source routing is only dangerous to hosts.
Yes, sorry. The question should have been: Has IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header ever been a requirement in v6 peering agreements?
not of which i am aware. imiho, from ops pov extension headers are unneeded kink. randy
Current thread:
- IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Fernando Gont (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Joe Abley (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Deepak Jain (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Fernando Gont (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Joe Abley (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Randy Bush (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Fernando Gont (Jun 29)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Fernando Gont (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Sam Stickland (Jun 30)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header John Osmon (Jun 30)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Joel Jaeggli (Jun 25)