nanog mailing list archives
Re: SMTP no-such-user issues
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:21:40 +1200
On 18/06/2008, at 1:20 AM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Steve Bertrand wrote:Frank Bulk - iNAME wrote:Once you've performed a full capture on port 25, Wireshark does a nice jobOk. I've never captured in tcpdump and then imported into Wireshark before, but I'll do some tests, scp the file to my Windows workstation, then follow the stream.of providing an option to extract the relevant conversation by right-clicking on just one packet in that conversation and choosing something called "Follow the TCP stream", I believe.Once I ensure I get a clean stream, I'll post the results.As I research the documentation on the how-to specifics on capturing with tcpdump in a format that is Wireshark compatible, is there anyone here that could perform a simple test against their own domain email system, that can confirm or deny what I have been witnessing?
Wireshark reads pcap files. Spit them out with this option on the tcpdump commandline.
-w file -- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- SMTP no-such-user issues Steve Bertrand (Jun 16)
- Re: SMTP no-such-user issues Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)
- RE: SMTP no-such-user issues Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 17)
- Re: SMTP no-such-user issues Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)
- RE: SMTP no-such-user issues Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 17)
- Re: SMTP no-such-user issues Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)
- Re: SMTP no-such-user issues Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)
- Re: SMTP no-such-user issues Nathan Ward (Jun 17)
- Re: SMTP no-such-user issues Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)
- Message not available
- Re: SMTP no-such-user issues Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)
- Re: SMTP no-such-user issues Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)
- RE: SMTP no-such-user issues Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 17)
- Re: SMTP no-such-user issues Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)