nanog mailing list archives

Re: So why don't US citizens get this?


From: Hyunseog Ryu <r.hyunseog () ieee org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:08:36 -0500


I think it is simply the matter of ROI - Return on Investment - issue.
I'm still living in the area without city water, and when there is power
outage, I don't have water at all since my water pump still needs
electricity.
But some rural area has FTTH because of government funding RUS
(http://www.usda.gov/rus/) project.
And most of urban area, people are still happy with cable modem service.

People in Japan and South Korea are more of tendency to become
early-adapters.
So when they have new products, they wants to try it by majority.
But in U.S., we are still cost oriented, and if we don't need it, we
don't buy it. ^^

That's my 2 cents.


Hyun



Tom Vest wrote:
Sort of makes one wonder how the US came to have ubiquitous roads, or
power, or water distribution...

TV

On Jul 28, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:

Lets put aside for a moment the conspiracy theories of government
intervention and
the telcos evil doing, IMHO there is a simple reason why I don't have
fiber
going
to my house: geography & economics.

Japan:
- area = 377,873 Km^2
- density = 337/Km^2
- pop = 127.5 mill

USA::
- area = 9,826,630 Km^2
- density = 31/Km^2
- pop = 304.7 mill

I belive there are just few major cities in the US that have a
comparable or
higher
concentration of people like other large cities around the world.

I'd bet that if you deploy fiber in a given radious in a suburban
area in
Japan you
may reach hundreds or thousands of potential customers, do the same a
little
bit
north from where I live and you will reach a dozen guys, 50 cows and a
couple of
hundred chickens.

The US is so spread out that anything to do with transportation, being
people,
packages, or ip packets becomes quite costly.

Still I beleve is interesting to analyze why the US is lagging behind on
high speed
services.

My .02







Current thread: