Re: SBCglobal routing loop.

["Paul Wall" <pauldotwall () gmail com>]

I think that's precisely the problem, that the issue could not have
been handled "though other methods".

I agree NANOG is not a replacement for NOCs, but what about when the
NOCs are utterly useless and the issue is global in scope?

Given the parties involved, I'd like to think that Logan tried to go
through standard channels prior to posting.  Please realize this is no
slight against nLayer, but rather, "the new AT&T" and their concept of
customer service.

Paul

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Ren Provo <ren.provo () gmail com> wrote:
> What did your upstream transit supplier advise before you escalated this to
> the global audience at NANOG?
> This is the second time in 24hrs you have requested assistance here which
> could have been handled via other methods.
> -ren
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Logan Rawlins <logan.rawlins () highwinds com>
> wrote:
>
> > Anyone from sbcglobal out there?  i'm seeing a routing loop.  Please
> > contact me off list  thanks.
> >
> > sourceip:  69.16.137.66
> >
> >
> > tracert 75.58.215.133
> >
> > Tracing route to adsl-75-58-215-133.dsl.hstntx.sbcglobal.net [
> > 75.58.215.133]
> > over a maximum of 30 hops:
> >
> > 1     2 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.113.1
> > 2     1 ms     2 ms     2 ms  69.16.137.66
> > 3     1 ms     2 ms     2 ms  e-2-21-1000m.core-04.phx2.puregig.net
> > [69.16.128
> > .110]
> > 4     2 ms     2 ms     5 ms  v303.ar1.ph.hwng.net [69.16.128.137]
> > 5     1 ms     1 ms     2 ms  ve1011.r2.ph.hwng.net [69.16.190.161]
> > 6    11 ms    20 ms    11 ms  2-1.r1.la.hwng.net [69.16.191.37]
> > 7    12 ms    11 ms    11 ms  vl101.ar1.lax1.us.nlayer.net [69.31.127.29]
> > 8    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  ae0-60.cr1.lax1.us.nlayer.net
> > [69.31.127.165]
> > 9    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  ex1-g12-0.eqlaca.sbcglobal.net
> > [69.31.127.50]
> > 10    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  151.164.188.139
> > 11    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  bb2-p14-0.scrm01.sbcglobal.net
> > [151.164.188.138]
> >
> > 12    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  151.164.188.139
> > 13    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  bb2-p14-0.scrm01.sbcglobal.net
> > [151.164.188.138]
> >
> > 14    14 ms    11 ms    11 ms  151.164.188.139
> > 15    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  bb2-p14-0.scrm01.sbcglobal.net
> > [151.164.188.138]
> >
> > 16    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  151.164.188.139
> > 17    11 ms    12 ms    11 ms  bb2-p14-0.scrm01.sbcglobal.net
> > [151.164.188.138]
> >
> > 18    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  151.164.188.139
> > 19    12 ms    11 ms    11 ms  bb2-p14-0.scrm01.sbcglobal.net
> > [151.164.188.138]
> >
> > 20    12 ms    11 ms    11 ms  151.164.188.139
> > 21    11 ms    11 ms    12 ms  bb2-p14-0.scrm01.sbcglobal.net
> > [151.164.188.138]
> >
> > 22    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  151.164.188.139
> > 23    14 ms    11 ms    12 ms  bb2-p14-0.scrm01.sbcglobal.net
> > [151.164.188.138]
> >
> > 24    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  151.164.188.139
> > 25    11 ms    11 ms    16 ms  bb2-p14-0.scrm01.sbcglobal.net
> > [151.164.188.138]
> >
> > 26    14 ms    11 ms    12 ms  151.164.188.139
> > 27    11 ms    12 ms    12 ms  bb2-p14-0.scrm01.sbcglobal.net
> > [151.164.188.138]
> >
> > 28    12 ms    11 ms    11 ms  151.164.188.139
> > 29    11 ms    12 ms    12 ms  bb2-p14-0.scrm01.sbcglobal.net
> > [151.164.188.138]
> >
> > 30    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  151.164.188.139
> >
> > Trace complete.