nanog mailing list archives

RE: Force10 E300 vs. Juniper MX480


From: Eric Van Tol <eric () atlantech net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:03:11 -0400

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith O'neill [mailto:keith () pando com]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 10:35 AM
To: Chris Marlatt
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: Force10 E300 vs. Juniper MX480

...
Sure Foundry might be cheaper but I hear
more complaining about Foundry than any other platform.


I'd like to hear about the complaints regarding Foundry.  Off-list is fine, as I believe this may be off-topic for 
NANOG.  We've been considering using Foundry and during testing they seemed to work just fine, but as everyone knows, a 
lab environment rarely mimics real life.  I found a few highly annoying quirks, most of them with the CLI (why are my 
config mode commands shown in my operational mode command history, including partial question-marked commands? argh!), 
but interoperability with both Juniper and Cisco in an MPLS lab environment didn't present any showstoppers.

-evt

Current thread: