nanog mailing list archives
Re: TLDs and file extensions (Re: DNS and potential energy)
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 17:53:53 +0100
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, David Conrad wrote:
I could maybe see a problem with ".LOCAL" due to mdns or llmnr or ".1" due to the risk of someone registering "127.0.0.1"
RFC 1123 section 2.1 says TLDs can't be purely numeric. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: WEST 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER. SLIGHT OR MODERATE BECOMING ROUGH. THUNDERY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD.
Current thread:
- TLDs and file extensions (Re: DNS and potential energy) David Conrad (Jul 01)
- RE: TLDs and file extensions (Re: DNS and potential energy) michael.dillon (Jul 01)
- Re: TLDs and file extensions (Re: DNS and potential energy) Tony Finch (Jul 01)
- Re: TLDs and file extensions (Re: DNS and potential energy) Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 01)
- Re: TLDs and file extensions (Re: DNS and potential energy) Jean-François Mezei (Jul 01)