nanog mailing list archives

Re: AS 54271


From: "Christian Koch" <christian () broknrobot com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:40:10 -0400

interestingly,  before july 7th these prefixes were originating from another
private as - 65501, until sometime that day routes were withdrawn from 65501
and began being announced from 54271...



On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> wrote:

Scott Morris wrote:

Wouldn't it be better to ask the folks in Hungary (AS20922) who are
peering
with this site?


These are or appear to be all 20922's prefixes...

54271 is a stub from my vantage points that only appears from behind 20992.

 One side, I'd buy the typo.  Both sides, mutual typos are a little  more
difficult.


looks more like a lack of clue. off-hand I'd hazard that only one party is
involved.


 Not that conspiracy theories are all that much fun, but I'm finding the
one-sided mistake hard to believe.  Either that or the folks at AS20922
haven't figured out that an open bgp peer isn't a great idea!  :)

Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:joelja () bogus com] Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008
1:36 PM
To: Marshall Eubanks
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: AS 54271

those prefixes all have ripe route object with origin AS 20922

all the routes I see for a given prefix look like the following:

  2914 1299 12301 8696 20922 54271
    129.250.0.171 from 129.250.0.171 (129.250.0.12)
      Origin IGP, metric 1, localpref 100, valid, external
      Community: 2914:420 2914:2000 2914:3000 65504:1299

  2497 3257 12301 8696 20922 54271
    202.232.0.2 from 202.232.0.2 (202.232.0.2)
      Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external

  7660 2516 3257 12301 8696 20922 54271
    203.181.248.168 from 203.181.248.168 (203.181.248.168)
      Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external
      Community: 2516:1030

etc...

Marshall Eubanks wrote:

As of this morning, I am seeing BGP from AS 54271

*> 62.77.196.0/22   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
*> 62.77.254.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
*> 81.17.184.0/22   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
*> 81.17.190.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
*> 82.131.196.0/23  38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
*> 82.131.198.0/24  38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
*> 82.131.248.0/21  38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
*> 89.148.64.0/22   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
*> 89.148.70.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
*> 89.148.72.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
*> 89.148.78.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
*> 89.148.82.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
*> 89.148.96.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
*> 89.148.99.0/24   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i

This ASN has not been assigned to any RIR. Is this a bogon, or does
anyone know of a legitimate reason for this ?

Regards
Marshall








-- 
^christian$


Current thread: