nanog mailing list archives
Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
From: Russ Mundy <mundy () tislabs com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:51:12 -0400
At 10:24 AM -0700 7/10/08, David Conrad wrote:
Already gotten a hint that something along these lines would be desirable for LAX. I can propose something to the PC -- which would be more useful for folks, a more general DNSSEC signing workshop or a focused presentation on IANA's stuff? Regards, -drc
Folks might find the DNSSEC session at the recent ICANN meeting interesting since it focused on DNSSEC in the field and DNSSEC tools. Descriptions of the presentations as well as the slides are available at: http://par.icann.org/en/node/77 I imagine that folks might want something different at LAX but I's be happy to work with drc to put together a DNSSEC session of some sort if there was interest. Russ
On Jul 9, 2008, at 7:55 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:28 PM, David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> wrote:On Jul 9, 2008, at 4:17 PM, Randy Bush wrote:aside from just getting some cctlds signed, i will be interested in the tools, usability, work flow, ... i.e. what is it like for a poor innocent cctld which wants to sign their zone?If there is sufficient interest, we could do a bar bof to describe some of the tools IANA has...I think Sandy Murphy or other Sparta folks have presented some of the work they've done on this... Perhaps finding one/some of them and having a more operations focused presentation in LAX or ... is a good idea as well? -Chris
Current thread:
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning, (continued)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Martin Hannigan (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning David Conrad (Jul 10)
- RE: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Martin Hannigan (Jul 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow (Jul 10)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning David Conrad (Jul 10)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 10)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Michael Sinatra (Jul 10)
- RE: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Andrews Carl 455 (Jul 10)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Russ Mundy (Jul 10)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Joao Damas (Jul 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning David Conrad (Jul 10)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 09)
- RE: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Eric Davis (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Phil Regnauld (Jul 10)