nanog mailing list archives

Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning


From: Russ Mundy <mundy () tislabs com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:51:12 -0400

At 10:24 AM -0700 7/10/08, David Conrad wrote:
Already gotten a hint that something along these lines would be
desirable for LAX.  I can propose something to the PC -- which would
be more useful for folks, a more general DNSSEC signing workshop or a
focused presentation on IANA's stuff?

Regards,
-drc

Folks might find the DNSSEC session at the recent ICANN meeting interesting
since it focused on DNSSEC in the field and DNSSEC tools.  Descriptions of
the presentations as well as the slides are available at:

http://par.icann.org/en/node/77


I imagine that folks might want something different at LAX but I's be happy
to work with drc to put together a DNSSEC session of some sort if there was
interest.

Russ


On Jul 9, 2008, at 7:55 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:28 PM, David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
wrote:
On Jul 9, 2008, at 4:17 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

aside from just getting some cctlds signed, i will be interested
in the
tools, usability, work flow, ...  i.e. what is it like for a poor
innocent cctld which wants to sign their zone?

If there is sufficient interest, we could do a bar bof to describe
some of
the tools IANA has...


I think Sandy Murphy or other Sparta folks have presented some of the
work they've done on this... Perhaps finding one/some of them and
having a more operations focused presentation in LAX or ... is a good
idea as well?

-Chris




Current thread: