nanog mailing list archives
Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 09:59:27 -0700
On Jul 9, 2008, at 9:05 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Understanding that immediate DNSSEC deployment is not a realistic expectation..." I wonder what NANOG folk can do about the second part of that quote...get the root zone signed, get com/net/org/ccTLD's signed.. oh wait,
There are 4 ccTLDs (se, bg, pr, br) that are signed.As Joe has indicated, ORG is moving towards signing their zone (as are several more ccTLDs).
that's not nanog... doh! Pressure your local ICANN officers?
Mmph. https://ns.iana.org/dnssec/status.html (it's out of ICANN's hands) Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning, (continued)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Jeffrey Ollie (Jul 08)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 08)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 09)
- RE: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Martin Hannigan (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Sean Donelan (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Joe Abley (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning David Conrad (Jul 09)
- RE: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning michael.dillon (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning David Conrad (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Leo Bicknell (Jul 10)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Randy Bush (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning David Conrad (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Randy Bush (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning David Conrad (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Randy Bush (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow (Jul 09)