RE: Argument for cleaning up BGP announcements

["Barry Greene (bgreene)" <bgreene () cisco com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Check out:

http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0302/cidr.html

I still think the CIDR Report only has a impact if you have a team of
volunteers knocking people on the side of the head and getting them
to pay attention. People look at the top, but try looking at the
bottom 2/3.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On 
> Behalf Of Silas Moeckel
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 4:02 PM
> To: nanog () merit edu
> Subject: Argument for cleaning up BGP announcements
>
>
> I have the misfortune of attempting to make the argument to 
> one of the top 20 worst offenders on the CIDR report 
> aggregation summary.  If anybody has some good PHB fodder and 
> info on general bad things that can happen by doing things 
> this way please email me off list.  I'll summarize what I get 
> in a few days.  There is no major TE or similar reason for 
> them to be on there just bad practices since the last time I 
> restructured there network.  Obviously since things work 
> today they are hesitant to change.
>
> Silas Moeckel
> DSM Inc.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBR6KZ0L/UEA/xivvmEQLtCwCaAy2F8rp5IbfbfWzY3kDABJ6ejfEAn0Ff
pcaKf5KH8FDFjtkQ6l3ABiI4
=REYG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----