nanog mailing list archives
Re: potential hazards of Protect-America act
From: "James R. Cutler" <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:38:44 -0500
Well, it could affect the equipment required, floor space, real estate cost, log retention, bandwidth requirements, equipment addressing, procedures, training, trouble desk, employee count and, probably, more. So, I would think it would affect network operations. I would suggest that it is on topic. There are business and legal hazards along with the technical hazards. Compliance with differing data privacy and retention laws are not the least of these.
On Jan 29, 2008, at 3:46 PM, <michael.dillon () bt com> <michael.dillon () bt com> wrote:
I wonder if this is on topic? <http://www.crypto.com/papers/paa-ieee.pdf> Among other things, it discusses technical hazards of the act. --Michael Dillon
James R. Cutler james.cutler () consultant com
Current thread:
- potential hazards of Protect-America act michael.dillon (Jan 29)
- Re: potential hazards of Protect-America act James R. Cutler (Jan 29)
- RE: potential hazards of Protect-America act Frank Bulk (Jan 29)
- Re: potential hazards of Protect-America act Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 29)
- RE: potential hazards of Protect-America act Frank Bulk (Jan 29)
- Re: potential hazards of Protect-America act Warren Kumari (Jan 30)
- Re: potential hazards of Protect-America act Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 30)
- Re: potential hazards of Protect-America act Warren Kumari (Jan 30)
- Re: potential hazards of Protect-America act Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 29)
- Re: potential hazards of Protect-America act Sean Donelan (Jan 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: potential hazards of Protect-America act Henry Linneweh (Jan 31)