nanog mailing list archives

RE: Cox clamping VPN traffic?


From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:27:03 -0800


The throttling I am talking about occurred on business class service
which is rated at 16Mbps/2Mbps and is NOT cheap. I'd love to know what
the throttling mechanism Comcast uses is, as Cox swears up and down that
they have no such thing in place. That both got throttled to the EXACT
SAME, non multiple of a DS0, is just a bit too coincidental for me.

If it was some sort of trunk capacity or mux issue, I would expect the
BW I was left with to be a multiple of 64Kbps or 1.544 Mbps, not some
odd-ball number like 43Kbps.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Popovitch [mailto:yahoo () jimpop com] 
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 4:50 PM
To: Tomas L. Byrnes
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Cox clamping VPN traffic?

On Jan 25, 2008 12:17 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes <tomb () byrneit net> wrote:


I've got a local peer with Cox for VPN users to co-lo. A VPN 
connection that otherwise shows no issues just had their 
file transfer 
rate during a large file transfer over the VPN go from 10Mbps to 
43kbps, and stay there. This isn't transit, it's local peering.

I see the *exact* same problem with Comcast at home.  I get 
about 30 seconds of the 6.6Mbps provisioned rate then the 
drop kicks in and down to 43kbps it goes.  In talking with 
Comcast engineers privately, I've learned that the 
"provisioned" rates should no longer be
considered as sustainable, only initial.   Now I don't normally need a
sustained up/down rate, but it has come in handy in the past 
when up/down-loading backups or ISOs... but I guess those 
days are behind us as the large providers have started 
re-interpreting the definition of "provisioned", or to be 
more accurate they have implemented a TTL on it.  That said, 
I do see their point of view wrt PTP, esp torrent traffic, 
and their desire to limit it's impact on their networks....
but it does boil my blood when *I* need to use "my" bandwidth for
legitimate purposes only to find myself throttled. :-)   Part of me
wonders if this isn't an effort to push "business" class services.

-Jim P.



Current thread: