nanog mailing list archives
Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:50:40 -0500
On Jan 19, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Taran Rampersad wrote:
Rod Beck wrote:Concur. However, comma, if governments are charging taxes (such as the EU) it leads to the question of what people pay taxes *for* - and paying more taxes because they use the internet more would mean those that use more would pay more in usage fees and pay more in taxes - which runs completely against the stacks of documents written about equality on the internet. Not taking a side on that, but it is an interesting point to chew on - realistically, a balance would have to be struck.Ironically, the Net Neutrality debate is about the access providers trying to impose usage-based pricing through the backdor - on the content providers. It goes without saying I oppose it. It's the end users who decide what they view and hence ultimately generate the traffic flows. So the end users should be subject to the usage- based pricing.
Where are the "stacks of documents written about equality on the internet" that say "customers who use more should pay the same as customers who use less"? I am not taking a position on NN here, but I don't believe either side of the debate has said anything remotely to that effect.
If one side has, they are being quite silly. Oh, and where do I plug my 10GE port in for $39.99/month?
And, as an aside, the Network Neutrality issue affects the globe and is only being debated in one country.
Perhaps you should change that? :) -- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial, (continued)
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Rod Beck (Jan 18)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Michael Holstein (Jan 18)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Scott McGrath (Jan 18)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial David Conrad (Jan 18)
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Rod Beck (Jan 19)
- Message not available
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Scott McGrath (Jan 19)
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Rod Beck (Jan 19)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Taran Rampersad (Jan 19)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 20)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Taran Rampersad (Jan 20)
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jan 19)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Simon Leinen (Jan 20)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Simon Leinen (Jan 20)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Matthew Moyle-Croft (Jan 20)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Taran Rampersad (Jan 20)
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Alex Rubenstein (Jan 20)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Matthew Palmer (Jan 20)
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Alex Rubenstein (Jan 20)
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Frank Bulk (Jan 21)