nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Filtering
From: Andy Davidson <andy () nosignal org>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:21:15 +0000
On 15 Jan 2008, at 16:11, Ben Butler wrote:
As a transit consumer - why would I want to carry all this cr*p in myrouting table, I would still be getting a BGP route to the larger prefixanyway - let my transit feeds sort out which route they use & traffic engineering.
Maybe you don't get covering aggregates. That causes holes. Whether you care is a matter of local policy, though. :-)
Current thread:
- Re: Network Operator Groups Outside the US, (continued)
- Re: Network Operator Groups Outside the US Bill Woodcock (Jan 17)
- Re: Network Operator Groups Outside the US Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 17)
- RE: Network Operator Groups Outside the US Skeeve Stevens (Jan 16)
- Re: Network Operator Groups Outside the US Nathan Ward (Jan 19)
- Re: Network Operator Groups Outside the US Adrian Chadd (Jan 16)
- Re: Network Operator Groups Outside the US Rob Gallagher (Jan 16)
- Re: Network Operator Groups Outside the US Rob Gallagher (Jan 16)
- Re: Network Operator Groups Outside the US Masaru MUKAI (Jan 16)
- Re: Network Operator Groups Outside the US Joe Abley (Jan 17)
- Re: Network Operator Groups Outside the US Max Tulyev (Jan 19)
- Re: BGP Filtering Jon Lewis (Jan 19)
- RE: BGP Filtering Ben Butler (Jan 15)