nanog mailing list archives

Re: Fourth cable damaged in Middle Eest (Qatar to UAE)


From: "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:58:14 -0500


Marshall:

I don't see any cables for Lebanon. I also don't see any cable for
Syria. I see "Falcon" coming down an estuary on an edge border for
Jordan. In proximity, Israel has some redundancy, although I don't
have the granularity to strip out the specific cables. It looks like a
"branch" to me, a splice point in a cable that happens under the
water, which allows for multi-directional paths from a single cable.

I would think that route-views would have any of what you may need to
track down what's going on advertisement wise, and for free.

Best,

Marty



On Feb 3, 2008 7:33 PM, Marshall Eubanks <tme () multicasttech com> wrote:

Dear Sean;

Do you know how Syria, Jordan and Lebanon get their connectivity ?
They have dropped off the map today for us. (Or maybe yesterday - I
wasn't able to pay any attention to this yesterday.)

Our Egyptian audience remains very low, while Iran still seems to be
unaffected.

Regards
Marshall



On Feb 3, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:



A fourth submarine cable in the middle east was damaged Sunday
between Haloul, Qatar and Das, United Arab Emirates.

This is in addition to the damage affecting FLAG, SAE-ME-WE4, FALCON
cables.

Afer reviewing surveillance video of the area, Egypt's ministry of
maritime transportation is reporting no ships were near the FLAG or
SAE-ME-WE4 cables 12-hours before or after the cable damage near
Alexanderia, Egypt.  The reason for outage of the cables has
not been identified yet.






Current thread: