nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Connectivity Saga (part n+1)
From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:01:13 -0500
On Feb 2, 2008 6:24 PM, Thomas Kühne <thomas () kuehne cn> wrote:
Another factor is that with IPv4, you need to be pragmatic, because if you don't, you have no connectivity. With IPv6, you can impose arbitrary restrictions as much as you want, because IPv4 makes sure there is always fallback connectivity anyway.Maybe, but the most frequently encountered errors were time outs and those usually degrade performance drastically.
one might also consider that there may not be v4 conectivity in all cases, so if you offer up a AAAA please make sure the services on the relevant AAAA/A are consistent/available. -Chris
Current thread:
- IPv6 Connectivity Saga (part n+1) Thomas Kühne (Feb 02)
- Re: IPv6 Connectivity Saga (part n+1) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: IPv6 Connectivity Saga (part n+1) Thomas Kühne (Feb 02)
- Re: IPv6 Connectivity Saga (part n+1) Michael Sinatra (Feb 02)
- Re: IPv6 Connectivity Saga (part n+1) Christopher Morrow (Feb 02)
- Re: IPv6 Connectivity Saga (part n+1) Thomas Kühne (Feb 02)
- Re: IPv6 Connectivity Saga (part n+1) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)