nanog mailing list archives
Re: YouTube IP Hijacking
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:16:44 +0200
At 03:14 AM 25-02-08 -0500, Paul Wall wrote:
Results were planned to be presented at the next NANOG, but they shouldn't be a surprise to anyone in the industry: nobody filters.
Incorrect. Some do filter and do it well. Problem is that it is in general a minority - many of which can be found here on NANOG.
-Hank
Current thread:
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking, (continued)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Daniel Roesen (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Paul Ferguson (Feb 24)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Paul Stewart (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Jason (Feb 24)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Paul Stewart (Feb 25)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Paul Stewart (Feb 25)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Paul Stewart (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Daniel Roesen (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 25)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Simon Leinen (Feb 26)
- BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Pekka Savola (Feb 25)
- Re: BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Danny McPherson (Feb 25)
- Re: BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Pekka Savola (Feb 25)
- RE: BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Randy Epstein (Feb 25)
- Re: BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 25)
- RE: BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Randy Epstein (Feb 25)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Andrew D Kirch (Feb 26)