nanog mailing list archives
RE: YouTube IP Hijacking
From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:49:55 -0800
Pakistan is deliberately blocking Youtube. http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/24/1628213 Maybe we should all block Pakistan.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Will Hargrave Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 12:39 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Sargun Dhillon wrote:So, it seems that youtube's ip block has been hijacked by a more specific prefix being advertised. This is a case of IPhijacking, notcase of DNS poisoning, youtube engineers doing somethingstupid, etc.For people that don't know. The router will try to get the most specific prefix. This is by design, not by accident.You are making the assumption of malice when the more likely cause is one of accident on the part of probably stressed NOC staff at 17557. They probably have that /24 going to a gateway walled garden box which replies with a site saying 'we have banned this', and that /24 route is leaking outside of their AS via PCCW due to dodgy filters/communities. Will
Current thread:
- YouTube IP Hijacking Sargun Dhillon (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Will Hargrave (Feb 24)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Neil Fenemor (Feb 24)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Will Hargrave (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Martin Hannigan (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Simon Lockhart (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Jim Mercer (Feb 25)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Alexander Harrowell (Feb 25)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Jim Mercer (Feb 25)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Will Hargrave (Feb 24)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking John van Oppen (Feb 24)