nanog mailing list archives
Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime
From: "J. Oquendo" <sil () infiltrated net>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:12:18 -0500
michael.dillon () bt com wrote: (removed cc)
I was actually targeting this suggestion to those who currently distribute Internet Explorer kits. So it wasmore of a suggestion to not distribute the browser that is most vulnerable. And if you make installation ofFirefox a requirement to come out of quarantine, that does not imply that people need to uninstall their other browsers. This is to give them the experience of something new knowing that a certain percentage will continue using it and not be reinfected. And reducing reinfections cuts your costs of detection and blocking compromised PCs.
Then what about antivirus and antispyware. Why should one be favored over the other. How many providers are suggesting this. It has an outside view of product favoritism. Perhaps the marketing teams could suggest a few free ones e.g. Avast, AVG, Adaware. There is the potential to clean up a lot of the trash that comes in and out of the network but then what, I could see ISPs' call centers screening "I just installed AVG but I can't get it to work". Same goes for Firefox or any other product. Do you then look to support these.
I agree wholeheartedly that ISP's should step up to the plate considering their own resources are being abused and have the potential for some serious damage (imagine 70% of Cox, Comcast, TW being botnets aimed at your network). Sadly, this will be argued for a few more posts then deemed offtopic to be re-argued and unevaluated in the future.
-- ==================================================== J. Oquendo SGFA #579 (FW+VPN v4.1) SGFE #574 (FW+VPN v4.1) wget -qO - www.infiltrated.net/sig|perl http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF684C42E
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime, (continued)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Jim Popovitch (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Andre Gironda (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime JC Dill (Feb 13)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Andre Gironda (Feb 13)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Mark Radabaugh (Feb 13)
- RE: IBM report reviews Internet crime Frank Bulk (Feb 14)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Tony Finch (Feb 13)
- RE: IBM report reviews Internet crime michael.dillon (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime J. Oquendo (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime John Dupuy (Feb 13)