nanog mailing list archives

RE: What to do when your ISP off-shores tech support


From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" <mksmith () adhost com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:34:55 -0800



-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Black [mailto:black () csulb edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 10:32 AM
To: Etaoin Shrdlu; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: What to do when your ISP off-shores tech support

On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:10:33 -0800
  Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu () deaddrop org> wrote:
Matthew Black wrote:

On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:51:41 -0800
 "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net> wrote:

Cox Communications has fully on-shore support. Here in SD they are
actually LOCAL.

In Verizon land, residential customers do not have
CLEC voice or DSL alternatives. We do not have Cox.
Our area is served by Charter Communications who has
the broadband cable monopoly. Verizon has the fiber
monopoly with their FIOS. AT&T fiber is not possible
in Verizon land. Nobody competes against Verizon for
residential service in Southern California.

Sir, both COVAD and DSLExtreme beg to differ. Seriously. I just checked.

--
The histories of mankind are histories only of the higher classes.

Thomas Malthus


Going through COVAD's interactive DSL chooser,
there are no options for RESIDENTIAL service.

<http://covad.com/web/index.html>


DSLextreme is charging a higher price than Verizon
and I suspect they are simply reselling Verizon's
DSL rather than connecting my copper to their
network. That's hardly what I consider CLEC service.
I could be wrong and would switch if I could. But I
don't see them offering voice and that's why I conclude
they are reselling Verizon's DSL service.

matthew black
california state university, long beach

They are probably using Verizon for the local loop, but they also <hopefully> have their own DSLAM's and Layer 3 
network to transport your data.  That would be a good question to ask them.  It sounds like you have a price/quality 
issue going on.  Do you want to pay a little more for better service?  If price is your main qualifier then you may be 
stuck vis a vis quality.

Mike

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description:


Current thread: