nanog mailing list archives
Re: No route to verizon
From: William Warren <hescominsoon () emmanuelcomputerconsulting com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:46:35 -0500
Matthew Black wrote:
whoops meant that to go to the list. I thought i had their website..but i didn't.On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:05:44 -0400 "Sharlon R. Carty" <me () sharloncarty net> wrote:Hello, This is my first post. Can anyone provide some info or Verizon why there is no connectivity toVerizon CA(Verizon Business UUNETCA8-A)? Can not reach the following net range: 66.48.66.160 - 66.48.66.175My traceroute also ends with ALTER.NET: traceroute to 66.48.66.160 (66.48.66.160), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets ...7 los-edge-01.inet.qwest.net (63.147.28.181) 1.701 ms 1.870 ms 1.734 ms 8 los-core-01.inet.qwest.net (205.171.32.33) 1.755 ms 1.670 ms 1.823 ms 9 lap-brdr-01.inet.qwest.net (205.171.32.10) 1.722 ms 2.082 ms 2.676 ms 10 0.so-4-3-0.BR1.LAX7.ALTER.NET (204.255.169.193) 2.094 ms 2.046 ms 1.720 msmatthew black e-mail postmaster california state university, long beach
Current thread:
- No route to verizon Sharlon R. Carty (Dec 15)
- Re: No route to verizon Martin List-Petersen (Dec 15)
- Re: No route to verizon Roy (Dec 15)
- Re: No route to verizon Justin M. Streiner (Dec 15)
- RE: No route to verizon Sharlon R. Carty (Dec 15)
- Re: No route to verizon Alex H. Ryu (Dec 15)
- RE: No route to verizon Sharlon R. Carty (Dec 15)
- Re: No route to verizon Matthew Black (Dec 15)
- Re: No route to verizon William Warren (Dec 15)