nanog mailing list archives

Re: Is Usenet actually dead?


From: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:47:39 +0000 (GMT)

RES> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:19:44 -0400
RES> From: Robert E. Seastrom

RES> If trends have continued since last I looked at it, very manageable
RES> after you take out the binaries.  Insignificant if you could figure
RES> out a way to get rid of the flames and spam.  :)

Usenet - binaries - flames - spam = pretty close to "actually dead"

;-)


Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
________________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.


Current thread: