nanog mailing list archives
Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mis take
From: Danny McPherson <danny () tcb net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:44:50 -0600
On Aug 14, 2008, at 11:37 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
Okay, I admit I haven't paid the closest attention to RPKI, but I have to ask: Is this a two-way shared-key issue, or (worse) a case where we need to rely on a central entity to be a key clearinghouse? The reason why I mention this is obvious -- the entire PKI effort has been stalled (w.r.t. authority) because of this particular issue. Any thoughts on that?
See Randy et al's presentation here: <http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0610/bush.html> In short, the latter, which is precisely DRC's point. -danny
Current thread:
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mis take Paul Ferguson (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mis take Danny McPherson (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mis take Sandy Murphy (Aug 15)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mis take Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mis take Sandy Murphy (Aug 15)
- RE: Validating rights to announce a prefix (was: Public shaming...) michael.dillon (Aug 15)
- Re: Validating rights to announce a prefix Robert Kisteleki (Aug 15)
- RE: Validating rights to announce a prefix michael.dillon (Aug 15)
- RE: Validating rights to announce a prefix (was: Public shaming...) Skywing (Aug 15)
- RE: Validating rights to announce a prefix (was: Public shaming...) michael.dillon (Aug 15)
- RE: Validating rights to announce a prefix (was: Public shaming...) Skywing (Aug 15)
- Re: Validating rights to announce a prefix Robert Kisteleki (Aug 15)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mis take Danny McPherson (Aug 14)