nanog mailing list archives
Re: route policy (Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake)
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:52:55 -0700
Hi, On Aug 14, 2008, at 6:38 AM, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/08/experts-accuse.html "The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority -- which coordinates the internet -- has been prototyping a system to sign the root-zone file for the last year, but they can't do the same for the internet's top servers without approval from the Department of Commerce" Sounds like some work that could be recycled (and save being wasted if it's decided to have Verisign do the dnssec instead)
Just to be clear, the stuff at https://ns.iana.org/dnssec/status.html will be used for more than the root, e.g., .ARPA, children of .ARPA, IANA.ORG, etc., regardless of who ends up signing the root.
Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: route policy (Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake) Brandon Butterworth (Aug 14)
- Re: route policy (Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake) David Conrad (Aug 14)
- Re: route policy (Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake) Pekka Savola (Aug 14)