nanog mailing list archives

Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 )


From: Per Heldal <heldal () eml cc>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:41:01 +0200


On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 11:40 +0930, Mark Smith wrote:
The model we're talking about seems to me to be that old model on
it's head. The devices at the edge of the core network are fully aware
of the underlying topology of the core network so they can make
informed forwarding decisions. The tunnelling encapsulation only serves
the purpose of transporting protocols/payloads, that aren't native in
the core, from edge-to-edge. The tunnelling function doesn't try to
control or have to take responsibility for the selecting paths taken
across the core.

This is just is a slight move of the core/edge boundary. Core switching
capabilities (MPLS) have been added to edge devices which were pure
terminal-devices from an ATM-perspective. The MPLS-cloud is just as
obscure as ATM to a non-MPLS-speaking IP-device. 


//per


Current thread: