nanog mailing list archives
Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman () es net>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:45:08 -0700
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:57:07 -1000 From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com> Sender: owner-nanog () merit eduSo run IPv6 natively and your tunneling issues are history.son, get a clue. i work for the first isp on the bleeping planet to deploy native ipv6
I beg to differ. Add the word "commercial" and I might agree. Sitting under my desk is the first system in the US with a production IP address. (No, it's not still running. It's an old DEC Alphstation.) ESnet has run native IPv6 as a fully supported production service for years. Randy is right that eliminating tunnels does not make all of the IPv6 problems go away. It just eliminates the ones caused by the use of tunnels. The REAL problems are not going anywhere for a long time, it ever. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman () es net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6), (continued)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Fred Baker (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Fred Baker (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Fred Baker (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Kevin Oberman (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Alain Durand (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Jari Arkko (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 28)
- Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Alain Durand (Sep 28)
- Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 28)
- Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Alain Durand (Sep 28)
- Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) John Curran (Sep 29)
- Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Eliot Lear (Sep 29)