nanog mailing list archives

RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter

From: "James Jun" <james () towardex com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:20:58 -0400


James,
So it is the vendor's fault that you didn't properly engineer your
network and size the right kit for the job?  Learn a little
engineering 101 to avoid these situations.


Did I ever mention that *I* didn't properly engineer my network (there are
no sup32's on my network as of date)? 

Consider your own arrogance before you make idiotic statements that add no
value to discussion.

james

Current thread:

Re: Yahoo! Mail/Sys Admin, (continued)
- - - Re: Yahoo! Mail/Sys Admin Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 23)
    - RE: Yahoo! Mail/Sys Admin Raymond L. Corbin (Sep 23)
    - Re: Yahoo! Mail/Sys Admin Ken Simpson (Sep 24)
    - RE: Yahoo! Mail/Sys Admin Jason J. W. Williams (Sep 24)
    - Re: Yahoo! Mail/Sys Admin Al Iverson (Sep 24)
    - RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 23)
    - pointing default (was Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter) Randy Bush (Sep 23)
    - Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter John A. Kilpatrick (Sep 21)
    - RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter James Jun (Sep 22)
    - Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter micky coughes (Sep 22)
    - RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter James Jun (Sep 22)
    - RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter John A. Kilpatrick (Sep 25)
    - RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Lincoln Dale (Sep 21)
    - RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 21)
    - Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Matt Liotta (Sep 21)
    - RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Lincoln Dale (Sep 21)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Forrest (Sep 09)