nanog mailing list archives

Re: Standard prefix length filtering


From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:45:07 -0400


On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:03:35AM +0100, Andy Davidson wrote:
On 19 Sep 2007, at 06:22, chk 543 wrote:
Is there a standard prefix length most providers filter on, or is  
there a way to find out what each provider filters on? We have been  
assigned a /22 and are wondering if we will have any issues with  
this block.

There are no hard and fast rules, but a general rule is the more you  
de-aggregate the more problems you are going to have, so unless you  
have a very good reason not to, announce the /22 and nothing longer.

...and if you think you have "a reason" to do so, carefully consider
if the shorter prefix needs to be visibly globally or not.  If you
still are intent on deaggregating on a global scale and wish to
guarantee no problems, send the deaggregates in addition to the
aggregate such that you will still be visible to more-specific filters.

Cheers,

Joe

-- 
             RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE


Current thread: