nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 10:32:32 -0400
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 05:50:25PM -0500, Forrest wrote: [snip]
It seems either option would be better for not breaking connectivity than
[snip] Flatly, in my experience breaking connectivity for the apathetic or clueless folks abusing the commons is the only way to get them to change behavior. At worst, your own customers are inconvenienced while the other party gets rulers and prepares for a locker room measuring contest, and you relevent first poking a hole in a policy. At best, clued technical people trapped in the remote networks' organization get an "I told you so" reason to Do The Right Thing. You can rathole the discussion on specific implementations and memory structures all the livelong day, but that won't change any individual operator's behavior. Are your confident YFRV will deliver any updated feature[s] in a timescale that fits your own networks' projected FIB & memory crush? Will it actually address the problem or just move the curve a little further into the future? Cheers, Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter, (continued)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Stephen Sprunk (Sep 10)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter bmanning (Sep 11)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Nathan Ward (Sep 08)
- Forward for filtering, was: Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 23)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Bradley Urberg Carlson (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Forrest (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Russ White (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Forrest (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Andrew - Supernews (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Forrest (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Joe Provo (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Forrest (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Stephen Sprunk (Sep 10)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Kevin Loch (Sep 10)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Stephen Sprunk (Sep 10)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Kevin Blackham (Sep 10)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 11)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Adrian Chadd (Sep 11)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Russ White (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Andrew - Supernews (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 08)