nanog mailing list archives

Re: Creating demand for IPv6


From: Mark Smith <nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:22:59 +0930


On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:42:23 -0400
"William Herrin" <herrin-nanog () dirtside com> wrote:


On 10/2/07, Brian Raaen <braaen () zcorum com> wrote:
Actually, a
better way to push IPv6 is make users want it and feel like they are missing
out if they don't have it.  I campaign with some kind of slogan like 'got
IPv6' or "I've got ultra high tech IPv6 for my internet and you don't" with a
web url like www.getipv6.com (oops, some domain squatter already registered
it).

Brian,

I offer you two words: Ford Edsel.

It doesn't matter how clever you make the marketing campaign if on
finding out what the product actually is the customers decide they
don't want it.


        This all boils down to simple economics.... supply and demand.

As far as I can tell, IPv6 is at least theoretically capable of
offering exactly two things that IPv4 does not offer and can't easily
be made to offer:

1. More addresses.
2. Provider independent addresses

At the customer level, #1 has been thoroughly mitigated by NAT,
eliminating demand. Indeed, the lack of IPv6 NAT creates a negative
demand: folks used to NAT don't want to give it up.


Those people don't know any better, because they probably haven't used
a NAT free Internet. Most North Koreans probably aren't asking for
democracy either.

Have you used a NAT free Internet?

So if more addresses was "thoroughly mitigated by NAT", when were these
problems that NAT creates fixed? 

http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/what-nats-break.html


This community (network operators) has refused to permit #2, even to
the extent that its present in IPv4, eliminating that source of demand
as well.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin                  herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr.                        Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


-- 

        "Sheep are slow and tasty, and therefore must remain constantly
         alert."
                                   - Bruce Schneier, "Beyond Fear"


Current thread: