nanog mailing list archives

Re: 240/4

From: Alain Durand <alain_durand () cable comcast com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:21:36 -0600





On 10/18/07 2:17 PM, "Brandon Galbraith" <brandon.galbraith () gmail com>
wrote:

Alain,

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Comcast started moving to IPv6 addressing
*because* they ran out of 10. space.


Absolutely. I made the point earlier, making 240/4 work is about the same
order of magnitude as moving to IPv6. Not worth it for us.

   - Alain.

Current thread:

Re: 240/4, (continued)
- - - Re: 240/4 Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 17)
    - RE: 240/4 Church, Charles (Oct 17)
    - Re: 240/4 Adrian Chadd (Oct 17)
    - Re: 240/4 Daniel Karrenberg (Oct 18)
    - Re: 240/4 Joe Greco (Oct 18)
    - RE: 240/4 michael.dillon (Oct 18)
    - Re: 240/4 Stephen Wilcox (Oct 18)
    - Re: 240/4 Jon Lewis (Oct 18)
    - Re: 240/4 Alain Durand (Oct 18)
    - Re: 240/4 Brandon Galbraith (Oct 18)
    - Re: 240/4 Alain Durand (Oct 18)
    - Re: 240/4 James R. Cutler (Oct 18)
    - Re: 240/4 Joe Greco (Oct 18)
    - RE: 240/4 michael.dillon (Oct 18)
    - RE: 240/4 michael.dillon (Oct 18)
    - RE: 240/4 michael.dillon (Oct 18)
    - RE: 240/4 (MLC NOTE) Alex Pilosov (Oct 18)
    - Re: 240/4 (MLC NOTE) S. Ryan (Oct 19)
    - Re: 240/4 Joe Greco (Oct 18)
    - Re: 240/4 Vince Fuller (Oct 18)
    - Re: 240/4 Joe Greco (Oct 18)

(Thread continues...)