nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 routes, was: How Not to Multihome


From: "William Herrin" <herrin-nanog () dirtside com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 21:21:27 -0400


On 10/8/07, Keegan.Holley () sungard com <Keegan.Holley () sungard com> wrote:
Wouldn't resources still be an issue.  Since the address space is so much
larger wouldn't the 235k v6 routes take up more than 4 times the router
memory?

Keegan,

According to Cisco's product feature pages IPv6 routes take up twice
as much space in the TCAM as IPv4 routes. Make of that what you will.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin                  herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr.                        Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: