nanog mailing list archives

Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)


From: John Curran <jcurran () mail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:15:26 -0400


At 3:55 PM +0200 10/1/07, Phil Regnauld wrote:

      I don't think you need government taxing for that.  I think
      that the IPv4 trading market we're about to see appear
      will resolve that issue very quickly.  Either you can afford it, or
      you can't.

What happens if folks can somehow obtain IPv4 address blocks
but the cumulative route load from all of these non-hierarchical
blocks prevents ISP's from routing them?

/John


Current thread: