nanog mailing list archives
Re: Comcast.net Email Admin
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:33:22 -0500 (EST)
Yes, I understand that people who have never worked in a large providers won't get it. Nevertheless, I still think it is a good idea for folks to have separate infrastructure for contacts such as abuse, security, postmaster so they can work even when other groups in a large company
make changes to their corporate gateways, routers, etc. Instead of relying on postmaster () example com or abuse () example com, which get messed up because a corporate IT person is trying to keep stuff outof the corporate network; you might also consider things like http://postmaster.example.com/ or security () security example com which
can be routed to its own separate infrastructure.
Current thread:
- Comcast.net Email Admin Stasiniewicz, Adam (Nov 29)
- Re: Comcast.net Email Admin Sean Donelan (Nov 29)
- Re: Comcast.net Email Admin William Herrin (Nov 29)
- Re: Comcast.net Email Admin Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 30)
- Re: Comcast.net Email Admin Sean Donelan (Nov 29)