nanog mailing list archives
Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:20:38 +0530
On Nov 22, 2007 6:15 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:Great. So half the world's population is dead, lots of dotbombs are out of business .. but you have LOTS of IP space that's suddenly unused and available.Is this actually a serious alternative to migrating to IPv6?
Dotbombs are, if they occur. Not that you can bank on them to occur .. though given silly valley, they just might occur. If they do occur, and if the RIRs are on the ball about reclaiming IP space ... Lots of ifs.
Current thread:
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net, (continued)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Barry Shein (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 21)
- BOTNET reference involving oscilloscope Howard C. Berkowitz (Nov 23)
- Re: BOTNET reference involving oscilloscope Leigh Porter (Nov 23)
- Re: BOTNET reference involving oscilloscope Adrian Chadd (Nov 23)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Chris Edwards (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Leigh Porter (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 22)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Adrian Chadd (Nov 22)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 22)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Joel Jaeggli (Nov 26)
- RE: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Jamie Bowden (Nov 26)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Paul Jakma (Nov 22)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Eliot Lear (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Eliot Lear (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 21)