nanog mailing list archives
unwise filtering policy from cox.net
From: goemon () anime net
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:21:19 -0800 (PST)
if anyone from cox.net is reading... ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <abuse () cox net> (reason: 552 5.2.0 F77u1Y00B2ccxfT0000000 Message Refused. A URL in the content of your message was found on...uribl.com. For resolution do not contact Cox Communications, contact the block list administrators.)This seems a rather unwise policy on behalf of cox.net -- their customers can originate scam emails, but cox.net abuse desk apparently does not care to hear about it.
Current thread:
- unwise filtering policy from cox.net goemon (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net S. Ryan (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Jeff Shultz (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Joe Greco (Nov 20)
- [admin] Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Alex Pilosov (Nov 20)
- Re: [admin] Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Martin Hannigan (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net S. Ryan (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Martin Hannigan (Nov 20)
- RE: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Raymond L. Corbin (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Chris Owen (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 20)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 20)