nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Deployment
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:52:12 -0700
i think anycast is still broken, though we can at least ignore it and use v4-style anycast, which turns out to be what we need.
<recant> i am told by a good friend who lurks that this was actually fixed a year or two ago. a team of ops-oriented folk were sufficiently persistent and strident to get it fixed. randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Deployment Fred Heutte (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment Randy Bush (May 30)
- Operators: the IETF's Dark Gods David W. Hankins (May 31)
- Re: Operators: the IETF's Dark Gods Roy (May 31)
- Operators: the IETF's Dark Gods David W. Hankins (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment Fred Baker (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment John Curran (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment Randy Bush (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment Randy Bush (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment Valdis . Kletnieks (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment John Curran (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment Randy Bush (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment Randy Bush (May 30)