nanog mailing list archives
Re: Moving to IPv6 (Was: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 17:17:00 -0400
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:32:04PM +0100, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
Because for IPv6 to be useful to the masses, content is required.Indeed. I'd hoped there would be time to finish the multicast project first. I'll kick off getting BBC content up on v6The really big problem is that there is a case that when you do enable AAAA's on your service that suddenly there is a possibility that some user can't reach your site properly anymore as they don't have proper connectivity to your site over IPv6.I'll start with a stand alone site that users elect to visit while testing When it goes on the main site it'll probably be a peers only service which they can opt into (as we use DNS LB we can return AAAA only to participating ISPs) if they are ready to handle the user support needed
How does one opt-in to this? - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
Current thread:
- Re: Moving to IPv6 (Was: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Brandon Butterworth (May 27)
- Re: Moving to IPv6 (Was: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Jared Mauch (May 27)