Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted

["william(at)elan.net" <william () elan net>]

On Sun, 27 May 2007, Chris L. Morrow wrote:

> > So, I think I can sum up your reply by saying that your suggestion is
> > to provide a lesser service than we do now (v4 NAT, proxies, etc.
> > sound to me like lesser service), during the transition period.
>
> I think you also missed the suggestion that sending out CPE with DD-wrt
> was a 'good idea'. Honestly DD-wrt/open-wrt are nice solutions for testing
> or for people willing to fiddle, they are not a good solution for
> 'grandma'.

My parents and brother both have linksys with dd-wrt that I put up.
I don't maintain it at all and it "just works". No, they are not using
v6, but if it was available I don't anticipate any problems as their
system os at home all support it now.

--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william () elan net