nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP CALEA compliance
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 00:34:14 -0400
On Thu, 24 May 2007 09:01:26 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said:
On 5/24/07, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:The more I think about this, the more I think a refereed boxing^h^h^h^h^h^hpanel discussion between representatives from DHS, FBI, EFF, FCC, Verisign, Neustar, and ITU might be a good approach to this.Humor me.. but just where does ITU come into this whole mess?
The ITU itself is likely irrelevant. However, those who run ISPs across either the left or right puddle are likely to be hit with CALEA-like issues within the next few years, when their countries adopt similar laws. And those who think the EU's stand on privacy of data will prevent a CALEA should consider the sorts of data-retention proposals that are getting floated over there. Yes - the laws themselves are politics. Being able to install compliant routers without breaking the budget is totally operational... ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance, (continued)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Mike Hammett (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jason Frisvold (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Steven M. Bellovin (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Martin Hannigan (May 12)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Joe Provo (May 12)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Martin Hannigan (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Albert Meyer (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Owen DeLong (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Valdis . Kletnieks (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Andy Davidson (May 24)