nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?
From: Donald Stahl <don () calis blacksun org>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 21:55:26 -0400 (EDT)
The M10i doesn't have an FPC blade per se (it's built into the chassis) so in the context of the M10i I assumed "single quad gigabit port ethernet blade" meant a single card- though I could definitely be wrong. My knowledge of the Juniper line is sadly pretty limited.choice. Layout here is such that I'd expect to use a single quad gigabit port ethernet blade in each of a pair of M10i/M20 to achieve redundancy.he said 'blade' to which I read '4 pics in a FPC'... maybe it's a terminology thing? Neal?
-Don
Current thread:
- Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Neal Rauhauser (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Joe Abley (May 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Neal Rauhauser (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? sthaug (May 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Joe Abley (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Donald Stahl (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Chris L. Morrow (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Donald Stahl (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Hyunseog Ryu (May 14)
- oversubscribed ports for Juniper are a new feature Neal Rauhauser (May 14)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Chris L. Morrow (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Donald Stahl (May 14)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Warren Kumari (May 15)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Daniel Roesen (May 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Scott Weeks (May 14)