nanog mailing list archives
RE: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law.
From: "Andrew Kirch" <AKirch () AllThingsIT com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:22:24 -0400
We do not have any problem with SORBS. We use SORBS entire list with the exception of the DUL at all of our client sites. I have worked with Mat for years, and despite our differences with regard to DUL lists, our relationship has always been both respectful and cordial. This guy was talking out the wrong end of his anatomy, and Mat called him on it. You can like SORBS (as I do), or not like them, that's your choice, and I will respect all of you for it. But a follow-up bashing SORBS listing policies certainly went off topic if the original premise of the post was maybe a little off topic. I think what we're talking about here as the larger issue is your dog in your yard. Your dog is free to take a crap in your yard all it likes, but when your dog comes over to my yard and takes a crap, I might build a fence. I might also conscript something like Mat's service, or Steve Lindford's service, or mine to keep my yard clean, if that means your dog doesn't get to play in my yard... well that's just unfortunate for you. (or in another manner of speaking, I could care less) And damn, I think I just equated all of my volunteer time to the equivalent of a pooper-scooper... ooh well. Andrew D Kirch - All Things IT Office: 317-755-0200
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf
Of S.
Ryan Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:42 PM To: Steve Sobol Cc: Matthew Sullivan; nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Nothing is wrong with what he posted. The guy is a moron. However, I was taking my 15 min of fame to jab at SORBS policy of listing people
on
their respective lists. It's dysfunctional and broken, but that again is just my opinion. Oh and, of course publicly humiliating the guy is certainly not that cool. However, while it's not really above me to do the same, he
could
have removed the email address so spammers aren't adding to that guys list of problems. Anyway, don't mind me. I just wanted to add to the off-topic drivel
Mat
posted since I can't stand SORBS. :> Steve Sobol wroteth on 3/15/2007 7:31 PM:On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, S. Ryan wrote:Typical SORBS behavior. While this guy can demand all he wants,doesn'tmean he will get what he wants or that he's right or wrong.What's wrong with what Mat posted? The guy claiming DNS is regulated
by
federal law is an idiot. Not that I always agree with what Mat says,
but
the guy's claims are obviously and patently false. The claims, in
fact,
are so ridiculous that I tend to think he's making them to weasel
out of
solving the problem that got him listed in the first place. People
doing
that *deserve* to be publically ridiculed. When I talk to Mat I generally have no problems having a civil and productive discussion with him. But I don't start out with an
attitude,
and I don't cook up absurd stories to try to get out of fixing my
spam
problem. (Not that I have one, but if I did, I'd not try to weasel
out
offixing it.)Personally, we gave up using SORBS because of it's very high false-positive ratioYMMV; at $DAYJOB we don't seem to have the same problem. Disclaimer: My opinions, not my boss's, etc.
Current thread:
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law., (continued)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. S. Ryan (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Steve Sobol (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. S. Ryan (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Steve Sobol (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Randy Bush (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Rich Kulawiec (Mar 16)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Peter Corlett (Mar 17)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Rich Kulawiec (Mar 17)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Tony Finch (Mar 17)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Matthew Sullivan (Mar 17)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Steve Sobol (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. S. Ryan (Mar 15)
- RE: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Andrew Kirch (Mar 16)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Nachman Yaakov Ziskind (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Matthew Sullivan (Mar 16)